Congress recently conducted a hearing on H.R. 3424, legislation introduced by Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., that would deny deductions for certain reinsurance premiums paid by a foreign-owned U.S. insurer to an offshore affiliate. The legislation is a response to pressure from some U.S.-owned insurance groups that portray affiliate offshore reinsurance as a tax-avoidance strategy. These groups also argue that the tax is necessary to level the playing field and will not harm U.S. consumers.

We disagree. Affiliate reinsurance serves legitimate non-tax business purposes: it effectively mitigates the information asymmetry (adverse selection and moral hazard) between the insurers and reinsurers; and it allows risk and capital to be moved more quickly and easily within the insurance group in response to changing market conditions.

View Whitepaper

Experts Involved
Other Contributing Authors
Related files
The Impact Of HR 3424 On The US Insurance Market