HomeWorkAssessing Market Definition in Epic v. Apple App Store Antitrust Litigation
work

Assessing Market Definition in Epic v. Apple App Store Antitrust Litigation

We were retained on behalf of Epic Games to design a survey assessing whether Apple could profitably sustain a price increase on in-app purchases (IAPs) made through the Apple App Store. The survey results were critical to economic experts’ analysis of Apple’s ability to implement and maintain a 5% increase in IAP prices.

Practices
Surveys

More Surveys Work

Damages Estimation in Software Subscription Class Action
Consumer Decision-Making in Appliance Service Subscription Advertising Case
Valuing Features in Retail Membership and Subscription Programs
Advertising Dispute over Service Reliability
Valuation of Streaming Service Features in Music Royalty Setting
Survey and Economic Analysis in Music Webcasting Royalty Rate Proceeding
Consumer Choice Modeling to Evaluate Alcoholic Beverage Preferences
Lanham Act Survey and Damages Work in Super Bowl Campaign
Critique of Damages Methodology in False Advertising Case
Rebuttal of Overcharge Theory in ATV Product Liability Class Action
Evaluating Consumer Perception in Alleged Product Disparagement
Critique of Damages Methodology in GM Automotive Recall Class Action
Assessing Market Definition in Epic v. Apple App Store Antitrust Litigation
Smartwatch App Access Survey and Opposing Survey Evaluation in AliveCor v. Apple
Assessment of Customer Switching Behavior in Confidential Merger Matter
Survey Evaluation in US v. Google AdTech Antitrust Case
Quantifying the Impact of Misrepresented US Origin Under the Lanham Act